Pedagogical
Tool Box of Teaching Ideas
Compiled by
Daved Muttart
The sources indicated in red
are
given in full at the end of the Tool Box.
Many
of the ideas expressed herein come from the works referred to in this portfolio;
references are provided only where the texts contain further useful information.
Ideas to remember; Considerations
to be borne in mind
-
When stuck for an idea: Look at your course
objectives for inspiration.
-
What critical skills do students need
to have to be able to learn the course content?
-
Perryís scheme of cognitive and
ethical development indicates that different teaching strategies may be
appropriate at different stages of the course. Avoid challenging students
too hard too fast.
-
Different students learn best in different
ways (Voices pp. 101 et seq., Hess pp. 8-10)
-
Promote active learning: get students
doing
the course skills. Learning involves the construction of knowledge, not
merely the transfer of information. Visual representations of schemata
assist in the construction of knowledge.
-
Use the best tool for the job at hand:
Eagar;
Johnstone, pp. 52-62; Quiet Revolution p. 210, Quiet Revolution pp. 282-288)
bearing
in mind the potentials and their pitfalls of each method.
-
Use Kolb's cycle to enhance course content.
See Sunicki; Voices p. 124; Quiet Revolution p. 79;
and Davis p. 187. For hints on encouraging reflective observation,
see Voices pp. 137-138 (enlightenment assignment), Hess
pp. 73-74; 224 (admit slips).
-
Use Bloom's taxonomy to enhance course
content. Use Crooks's 3 stage "summary" of Bloom (Davis
p. 242). For examples of Bloom applied to law, see Quiet
Revolution pp. 161-3; Hess p. 293-7
-
Pick cases and examples which relate to
as many of the courseís teaching objectives as possible.
-
Chose materials which speak in as many
voices and empower as many different groups as possible (see Johnstone,
pp. 75 et seq.).
-
Where possible, use Computer Aided Instruction:
there is empirical evidence of its effectiveness.
-
Consider appointing student liason/advisory
teams to provide feedback on how the students feel the course is going.
Note: even though this Tool Box
is broken into large and small, some ideas may work in groups of any size.
Large Classes
Lecturing
-
Organize lecture to facilitate students
acquiring good sets of notes (See Davis, p.
265).
-
Grab the audience's attention at the beginning
of the class.
-
Provide roadmap for students at beginning
of lecture.
-
Put lecture in context.
-
Recap previous lecture or class.
-
Use examples.
-
Create a vicarious experience for audience.
-
Integrate lecture with other methods.
-
Schedule breaks.
-
Use puppets to facilitate the assumption
of different roles (professor to model first).
-
Relate something from current lecture
back to something from previous lectures.
Assessment: Self and Formative
-
Use One Minute Papers: muddiest point,
two main points of lecture, how did your thinking change, any question?
Use Bloom's Taxonomy and Kolb's Cycle to formulate questions. Increase
the level of difficulty of papers as course progresses. (See Davis,
pp. 349-351)
-
Evaluate effectiveness at end of each
class: What works for this particular group of students with this specific
course material?
-
Use class discussion to get feedback on
how well the students are learning.
-
Ask students to evaluate your teaching
in mid-course so that corrections can be made.
-
See assessment from a fellow instructor
(peer-pairing).
-
Reflect on mid-course and final assessment
to improve course.
Small Groups
-
Groups develop through different stages;
use techniques accordingly (See Voices, p. 202, 247).
-
Let groups form themselves or use learner
types to form groups
-
Try: Think, Write, Pair, Discuss (Voices,
p. 200)
-
Try Buzz Groups, Pyramiding, and Brainstorming
(Quiet Revolution, pp. 296-300)
-
Use a variety of discussion, devil's advocacy,
debate among students, student led discussions ...
-
Try role playing to bring case studies
alive.
-
For class participation, require students
to indicate that they have done the readings (See
Hess, pp. 224, 335)
-
Establish ground rules (See Davis,
pp. 64 et seq.)
-
Use Knoop's Problem Solving Model (Kreber,
p. 223).
-
Use Bloom's Taxonomy to keep discussion
moving forward (Davis, p. 84)
-
Use Student-Centred Problem-Based Learning
(Kurtz et al., Quiet Revolution p. 94)
-
Be aware of students' emotional development
along Affective Taxonomy (See Quiet Revolution pp.
168-169)
-
Use game-show format: e.g. Hollywood Squares.
-
Integrate student presentations into the
course.
Evaluation of Students
-
Schedule one assignment to require oral
presentation during instructor's office hours.
-
Use writing as a learning activity. Evaluate
at several stages of the writing process.
-
Give feedback along with assessment; make
evaluation serve a learning as well as a gate-keeping function.
-
Harness evaluation to assist in the realization
of course objectives.
Resources
B. Gross Davis,
Tools
for Teaching, (San Francisco CA; Josey-Bass, 2001)
J. Eagar,
The
Right Tool for the Job: The Effective Use of Pedagogical Methods in Legal
Education, (1997) 32 Gonz. L. Rev. 389
G.F. Hess
& S. Friedland, Techniques for Teaching Law, (Durham, N.C.;
Carolina Academic Press, 1999)
R. Johnstone,
Printed Teaching Materials: A New Approach for Law Teachers, (Sydney, Aust.;
Cavendish Publishing (Australia) Pty Ltd., 1996)
C. Kreber,
Learning Experientially through Case Studies? A Conceptual Analysis, (2001)
6 Teaching in Higher Education, 217
S. Kurtz,
M. Wylie, & N. Gold, Problem-Based Learning: An Alternative Approach
to Legal Education, (1990 ) 13 The Dalhousie Law Journal 797
M. Le Brun and R. Johnstone, The
Quiet
Revolution: Improving Student Learning in Law, (North Ryde,
N.S.W.; The Law Book Company Limited, 1994)
M.D. Svinicki
& N.M. Dixon, The Kolb Model Modified for Classroom Activities,
35 College Teacher141
Voices
from the Classroom: Reflections on Teaching and Learning in Higher Education,
J. Newton et al. (eds), (Toronto; Garamond Press, 2001)